Thursday, September 12, 2013

Fail Requisition; not a good collection manger; not a good army builder; not really sure what it is

GW eventual sorted out their Apple book store upload issues and the version of the Space Marine codex with the Force Requisition feature is available...without the ability to add units from Elites or Fast Attack.  Those aren't really important right?  They swear we'll get them in a few days.

On the surface the interface isn't too bad.  It could be the basis of a basic quick and easy army builder tool if it weren't missing some key features.  It lacks a strait up list view of the units you've added.  It also has no way to edit a unit once created other than to delete and recreate it.  

They say it's a collection manager, but its structured pretty badly for that.  Collections don't always match legal unit sizes and composition.  How do you represent those 20 extra plasma guns you have from the bygone days of 4th edition?  It doesn't have a way to specify what version of a model you are using,  Is it a 2nd ed Tech Marine model, or a 3rd ed Tech Marine?  These are all the features you'd want if you where managing your collection of Space Marines collected over a decade in the hobby.  And who gives a hell about points in your collection?  My closet isn't limited to only holding 4000 points of Space Marines.. 

The UI is structured better to be an army builder, but with a few fatal issues in that regard.  You can't set a target point size, your can't make more than one list, and you can add allies(not even allies from the same codex using another Marine Chapter).  It's also annoying in that any new unit you create is not added to the point totals until after it is saved, and, as I mentioned above, immutable from that point forward. 

Software is hard, and I pity the poor dev who had to develop this in whatever scripting support apple provides in their iBook framework.  But this seems like something that should have never been advertised and released.  It feels like some prototype a dev wrote as a proof of concept, and some manager decided to ship as a real product. 

It's disappointing really.  A fully integrated in codex army builder would be the killer app for digital rule books.  

7 comments:

  1. Yeah, I bet a junior dev guy discovered the apple-whatever script hooks in iBooks Author, and nobody with any sense put it through a proper set of tests. Which would make sense if GW only hired graphic designers to work on the iBook. They literally have no idea what to do with 'software'.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ah, iBA has no scripting support. The only way to do it is to hack something together using Javascript within an HTML widget.

    No way that could go wrong. No Way! :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well you do have to click a button to "launch" it. So javascript in HTML seems likely--unless there's a way to embed Objective-C code in an iBook.

      Eww. That's got to be very limited. I don't see it having any file system access or stand alone DB instance. That means all the unit types have to be hard-coded in the javascript. Double eww. Not very extensible. It's got to be at least 5000 lines of javascript in a single file. Triple eww.

      Delete
    2. Maaaaybe they're using the web connection to cloud-store the data...

      Oh, sorry, this is GW. What was I thinking?

      Honestly, if you can load HTML, why not point it to a website with proper storage for everything?

      Delete
  3. Really, they'd be better off just making an iOS native app.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They'd be better off doing nothing at this point. No product is better than a piss-poor broken one.

      Delete
    2. Well, it's a good thing the iBook wasn't full pri... Oh wait. :P

      Delete